In
the
last
couple
of
months,
some
people
have
started
watching
YouTube
on
their
phones
to
find
something
a
little
different:
an
endless,
TikTok-like
feed
of
videos
underneath.
These
weren’t
Shorts,
but
full-length
videos,
the
ones
YouTube
tends
to
refer
to
as
“longform.”
If
you
swiped
up,
instead
of
returning
you
to
the
homepage,
another
video
would
start
playing.
Swipe
again:
another
video.
So
far,
this
is
just
a
small
test
of
a
possible
feature,
the
kind
YouTube
runs
all
the
time.
This
one
has
been
live
since
August
and
is
one
of
several
ongoing
tests
of
new
ways
for
users
to
find
content
on
YouTube.
“If
you’re
a
viewer
in
the
experiment,”
a
forum
post
describing
the
test
says,
“these
new
discovery
experiences
could
include
a
mix
of
video
formats
including
long-form
videos
where
you’d
usually
see
Shorts
(example:
the
Shorts
Feed)
or
new
feeds
of
long-form
videos.”
When
I
asked
Google
about
the
test,
the
company
referred
me
to
that
forum
post.
“We’re
running
an
experiment
with
a
small
group
of
Android
users
that
allow
them
to
swipe
up
to
discover
more
videos
when
watching
in
either
portrait
or
fullscreen
landscape
mode,”
YouTube
spokesperson
Allison
Toh
said
in
a
statement.
Most
user
tests
don’t
go
anywhere,
and
I
would
bet
this
one
doesn’t
either.
But
the
fact
that
it
exists
at
all
says
a
lot
about
where
the
platform
might
be
headed.
YouTube
is
trying
hard
to
juice
discovery,
to
make
it
easier
for
people
to
find
new
and
interesting
stuff
to
watch
— and
to
help
new
creators
grow
their
audiences
on
a
crowded
platform
—
which
already
has
led
to
new
features
like
Hype
and
TV-centric
things
like
seasons.
But
it’s
possible
that
none
of
those
features
would
fundamentally
change
YouTube
in
the
way
that
endless
scrolling
would
change
YouTube.
Think
about
the
difference
when
you
open
YouTube
versus
when
you
open
TikTok.
On
YouTube,
you
see
a
screen
full
of
titles
and
thumbnails.
Some
of
them
are
likely
from
channels
you
subscribe
to;
others
are
things
YouTube
thinks
you
might
like
or
videos
you
started
but
haven’t
finished.
Your
job
is
to
pick
one
and
press
play.
On
TikTok,
though,
something
is
already
playing.
If
you
like
it,
do
nothing.
If
you
don’t,
swipe
up
and
something
else
starts.
The
magic
of
the
TikTok
approach
—
the
reason
everyone
is
so
desperately
trying
to
copy
it
—
is
that
it
is
almost
perfectly
efficient.
The
overarching
theory
of
TikTok
is
that
showing
you
anything
is
better
than
showing
you
nothing,
and
because
the
videos
are
so
short
and
scrolling
is
so
easy,
the
penalty
for
TikTok
showing
you
something
you
don’t
like
is
quite
low.
You
vote
with
your
scrolls,
and
the
algorithm
learns.
The
overarching
theory
of
TikTok
is
that
showing
you
anything
is
better
than
showing
you
nothing
YouTube
is
comparatively
a
mess.
Creators
have
to
try
and
grow
their
subscriber
counts,
which
is
both
an
important
community-building
tool
and
a
powerful
message
to
the
YouTube
algorithm
that
people
like
what
you’re
making.
But
most
people
don’t
find
videos
by
going
to
channels
or
even
by
opening
up
the
Subscriptions
section
of
the
app.
That’s
all
increasingly
buried.
Now,
people
mostly
find
videos
on
the
homepage,
in
the
recommendations
sidebar,
and
in
search
results.
That’s
why,
for
years,
creators
have
talked
about
how
important
thumbnails
are.
Jimmy
Donaldson,
MrBeast
himself,
the
most
popular
name
on
YouTube
and
the
person
you’d
think
would
least
need
to
game
the
algorithms,
once
called
his
obsession
with
thumbnails
“an
addiction”
and
said
his
team
makes
hundreds
of
options
for
each
video.
(He
also
ran
a
test
and
discovered
that
closing
your
mouth
in
thumbnails
made
more
people
click
on
them
— and
suddenly
closed-mouth
thumbnails
were
everywhere.)
Cleo
Abram
recently
described
working
with
multiple
thumbnail
designers,
making
slide
decks
of
her
favorite
thumbs,
and
having
to
develop
the
“confidence”
to
not
oversell
with
a
thumbnail
and
just
let
the
video
do
the
work.
There’s
a
whole
genre
of
content
and
a
whole
business
created
around
making
more
clickable
thumbnails,
and
many
creators
say
they
plan
their
thumbnail
before
they
plan
their
video.
You
can
see
why
it
would
be
compelling
for
YouTube
to
get
rid
of
all
that.
It’s
the
same
line
of
thinking
that
has
led
the
company
to
use
generative
AI
to
help
creators
make
backgrounds,
respond
to
comments,
and
even
come
up
with
video
ideas.
What
if,
YouTube
is
asking,
creators
didn’t
have
to
obsess
over
all
the
stuff
around
their
videos
and
could
just
focus
on
making
great
videos?
Everybody
wins!
All
those
changes
have
one
thing
in
common:
they
take
control
away
from
creators
and
hand
it
to
The
Algorithm
But
all
those
changes,
and
especially
this
latest
endless
scrolling
test,
have
one
thing
in
common:
they
take
control
away
from
creators
and
hand
it
to
The
Algorithm.
YouTube
creators
and
viewers
already
have
to
play
lots
of
algorithm
games,
of
course,
but
the
current
state
of
YouTube
at
least
gives
you
moves.
You
can
write
your
own
titles
and
develop
a
unique
thumbnail
style.
Managing
YouTube
is
a
lot
of
work,
yes,
but
it
also
gives
you
lots
of
chances
to
put
both
your
content
and
your
channel
in
front
of
the
audience.
And
if
they
watch
one
video,
you
have
lots
of
ways
to
get
them
to
watch
more.
An
endless
feed
removes
all
of
that
in
favor
of
whatever’s
next
in
the
scroll.
Inside
each
new
generative
AI
feature
and
automatically
playing
video
is
the
tacit
assumption
that,
actually,
what’s
best
for
everyone
is
just
to
do
whatever
YouTube
wants.
That
assumption
has
been
baked
into
TikTok
for
years,
which
is
why
everyone
made
dance
challenges
and
then
pivoted
to
hawking
stuff
from
the
TikTok
Shop.
YouTube
has
always
been
bigger,
more
varied,
more
fun.
This
one
tweak
could
break
that
for
good.
Already,
you
hear
creators
talk
about
struggling
to
balance
making
videos
they
want
to
make
— that
their
audience
wants
— and
videos
they
know
will
please
the
algorithm
and
thus
get
more
views.
In
an
endlessly
scrolling
YouTube,
there’s
no
balance.
It’s
just
pleasing
the
algorithm.
And
as
we’ve
seen
plenty
of
times
over
the
years,
whether
it’s
political
radicalization
and
conspiracy
theories
or
just
platform-dominating
genres
like
prank
videos
and
Depp
/
Heard
trial
coverage,
the
algorithm’s
job
is
not
to
incentivize
great
videos.
It’s
just
to
get
you
to
watch.
Maybe
that’s
where
YouTube
is
inevitably
headed.
Maybe
it’s
already
there,
as
viewers
increasingly
rely
less
on
following
creators
and
channels
and
more
on
watching
whatever
shows
up
on
the
homepage.
But
it
would
be
a
shame
to
see
YouTube,
still
the
most
creator-friendly
platform
and
the
place
where
many
creators
feel
they
can
actually
build
a
community
and
a
business,
deprecate
the
rest
of
the
platform
in
favor
of
an
autoplaying
feed.
At
that
point,
it
would
just
be
TikTok
with
longer
videos
— though,
in
a
world
of
endless
scrolling,
I
bet
they’d
get
shorter
and
punchier
and
have
more
music.
And
probably
try
to
sell
you
things.
The
TikTok-ification
of
YouTube
would
be
complete,
and
that
would
be
a
huge
bummer.
Comments