Kudos
to
Plaud
for
one
thing:
in
a
year
otherwise
marred
by
high-profile
failures
and
oh
so
much
AI
vaporware,
it
made
an
AI
gadget
that
does
exactly
what
it
claims
to
do
and
does
it
pretty
well.
The
gadget
is
called
the
NotePin,
and
it’s
a
$169,
pill-shaped
voice
recorder
that
can
transcribe,
summarize,
and
pull
important
information
out
of
your
audio.
This
is
something
current
AI
systems
can
actually
do
well! There’s
good
and
mature
tech
at
every
step
along
the
pipeline
here,
from
tiny
microphones
to
speech-to-text
transcription
to
natural-language
processing
and
AI
summarization.
The
NotePin
does
it
well.
But
the
reason
the
NotePin
works
is
also
the
reason
I
wouldn’t
recommend
buying
one.
AI
voice
recording
is
great
and
handy
and
being
commoditized
at
an
absolutely
blistering
pace.
With
iOS
18
or
macOS
Sequoia,
you
get
transcriptions
and
summarization
built
into
the
Voice
Memos
app.
Google’s
Pixel
Recorder
app
is
terrific
and
is
built
into
both
the
Pixel
phones
and
the
Pixel
Watch.
You
can
also
get
similar
features
from
lots
of
apps.
Do
you
need
a
dedicated
voice
recorder?
This
is,
of
course,
the
eternal
question
about
AI
assistants
as
a
whole.
Are
they
a
feature
of
your
existing
devices
or
a
gadget
category
unto
themselves?
Plaud’s
argument
for
dedicated
hardware
is
about
the
same
as
all
the
other
AI
startups:
that
ease
of
use
is
everything.
The
NotePin’s
accessories
are
core
to
its
appeal:
there’s
a
braided
lanyard
so
you
can
wear
it
around
your
neck,
a
wristband
so
you
can
wear
it
Fitbit-style
on
your
arm,
and
a
clip
so
you
can
put
it
almost
anywhere
else.
Plaud’s
argument
for
dedicated
hardware
is
about
the
same
as
all
the
other
AI
startups:
that
ease
of
use
is
everything
In
my
time
testing
the
NotePin,
I’ve
mostly
had
it
around
my
neck,
and
I’ve
used
it
to
note
reminders
while
driving,
ramble
long
ideas
to
myself
while
walking
the
dog,
and
summarize
calls
and
conversations.
It’s
certainly
handy
being
able
to
just
reach
down,
press
the
NotePin
until
it
vibrates
to
indicate
it’s
recording,
and
then
yammer
away
at
nothing
while
my
necklace
dutifully
listens.
Once,
when
I
was
particularly
enjoying
a
podcast,
I
just
played
the
whole
thing
on
speaker
so
the
NotePin
would
transcribe
and
summarize
it.
The
NotePin
is
easier
to
access
than
my
phone
in
my
pocket,
and
it’s
definitely
simpler
than
holding
my
wrist
in
front
of
my
mouth
for
minutes
at
a
time
while
shouting
into
my
watch.
The
form
factor
definitely
matters.
The
NotePin’s
mic
is
perfectly
fine:
the
audio
it
records
never
sounds
amazing,
but
in
every
realistic
scenario
I
tried,
it
was
good
enough
for
solid
transcription.
Plaud
estimates
the
device’s
battery
lasts
for
about
18
hours
of
recording
or
30
days
of
standby
time,
and
in
my
testing,
I’ve
done
about
four
hours
of
recording
over
about
10
days,
and
the
battery
just
hit
“Low.”
The
NotePin
charges
on
a
tiny
pad,
which
I’m
confident
I’m
going
to
lose
very
soon,
and
I
wish
it
was
just
a
simple
USB-C
plug.
But
look:
the
thing
works.
It
does
what
it
says
on
the
tin.
Plaud’s
transcriptions
and
summaries
are
mostly
pretty
good!
But
that’s
just
not
enough.Screenshots:
David
Pierce
/
The
Verge
The
major
problem
with
the
NotePin,
and
frankly
every
other
AI
gadget,
is
that
it’s
not
useful
enough
on
the
other
side.
Once
you’ve
made
some
recordings
with
the
NotePin,
you
import
them
into
the
Plaud
app,
which
is
relatively
quick
and
simple.
But
then
you
have
to
go
into
each
recording
and
manually
tell
the
app
to
transcribe
it,
pick
a
“template”
you
want
to
use
for
how
it’s
summarized,
and
then
come
back
a
few
minutes
later
to
see
what
it
came
up
with.
(You
get
300
monthly
minutes
of
transcriptions
and
basic
templates
for
free,
or
for
$80
a
year,
you
get
1,200
and
more
templates
and
features.)
That’s
too
much
busy
work.
Plus,
how
much
effort
am
I
really
saving
if
I
have
to
pull
out
my
phone
—
twice!
—
anyway?
The
transcriptions
are
good,
and
the
summaries
are
helpful,
and
so
far,
I
haven’t
had
any
huge
mistakes
or
hallucinations.
But
once
they’re
done,
they
just
live
in
reverse-chronological
order
in
the
Plaud
app.
The
app
correctly
noted
that
one
of
my
recordings
was
a
reminder
to
buy
retinol;
it
didn’t
remind
me
of
anything.
It
just
made
the
title
“Reminder
to
buy
retinol.”
When
I
wandered
my
kitchen
speaking
a
grocery
list
into
the
NotePin,
the
app
accurately
transcribed
that
list
for
me
but
just
titled
the
note
“Grocery
List
with
Various
Food
Items
and
Household
Essentials.”
It’s
not
really
the
NotePin’s
fault
that
it
can’t
do
more
than
turn
my
nonsensical
ramblings
into
text
files.
It’s
not
Plaud’s
fault,
either.
It’s
just
that
what
I
really
want
—
and
what
should
really
happen
—
is
for
it
to
take
that
grocery
list
and
add
it
to
the
grocery
list
I
already
have
on
my
phone.
It
should
add
that
reminder
to
my
to-do
list.
At
the
very
least,
the
app
should
be
able
to
combine
my
grocery
list
note
with
my
other
grocery
list
note,
but
it
can’t
do
that,
either.
Ultimately,
no
matter
what
you’re
recording,
odds
are
you
want
to
do
something
with
it
afterward,
and
Plaud
simply
can’t
do
most
of
those
things.
Eventually,
the
Plaud
app
just
began
to
feel
like
another
inbox
I
needed
to
check.
All
that
is
why
your
phone
or
smartwatch
might
be
insurmountable
foes
in
the
AI
assistant
wars.
They
might
be
marginally
less
convenient
— you
have
to
pull
it
out
of
your
pocket
instead
of
just
reaching
down
to
your
chest
—
but
they’re
far
more
connected
with
the
rest
of
your
digital
life.
Building
your
whole
world
around
a
transcription
app
just
doesn’t
make
any
sense.
It’s
possible,
over
time,
that
these
things
could
become
more
open.
Apple
and
Google
could
open
up
APIs
that
allow
AI
assistants
to
interact
with
the
other
apps
on
your
phone,
or
theoretically,
the
assistants
could
get
smart
enough
to
just
interact
with
the
apps
on
your
behalf.
Lots
of
developers
are
working
on
both
options.
But
as
it
stands
right
now,
the
Plauds
and
Humanes
and
Rabbits
of
the
world
just
can’t
do
enough.
AI
voice
recorders
are
a
great
idea
— but
they’re
not
a
new
kind
of
gadget.
Comments